Athenian democracy thesis

Thucydides the son of Milesias not the historianan aristocrat, stood in opposition to these policies, for which he was ostracised in BC. For example, "The same person could Athenian democracy thesis be a member of the Boule in two consecutive years, and could only be a Athenian democracy thesis twice in a lifetime.

Anything higher had to go before a court. In the 5th century at least there were scarcely any limits on the power exercised by the assembly. Rather than having to invade other societies and begin its fall with its defeat in the Peloponnesian War.

In the 5th century BC, principally as seen through the figure of Periclesthe generals could be among the most powerful people in the pols.

Rather than any citizen partaking with equal share in the rule, he thought that "Virtue understood as embracing courage and temperance and prudence as well as justice turns out to be the chief determinant for shares in rule.

Notably, this was introduced more than fifty years before payment for attendance at assembly meetings. This passage is often interpreted as a confession of collective regret and guilt on the part of the demos, once their anger gave way to second thoughts.

The allotment of an individual was based on citizenship rather than merit or any form of personal popularity which could be bought. Finally, even during his period of office, any officeholder could be impeached and removed from office by the assembly.

Athenion allied with Mithridates of Pontusand went to war with Rome; he was killed during the war, and was replaced by Aristion.

Compare and contrast Athenian democracy and modern democracy.

Citizens active as office holders served in a quite different capacity from when they voted in the assembly or served as jurors. The collectivization of political responsibility for decisions and Athenian democracy thesis in a democracy leads to dishonesty and the tendency to scapegoat individual speakers or magistrates.

The quantity of these suits was enormous: Allotment therefore was seen as a means to prevent the corrupt purchase of votes and it gave citizens a unique form of political equality as all had an equal chance of obtaining government office. Democracy is not the rule of the demos qua citizenship in the interest of the entire polis, but the self-interested rule of a sociological faction.

Their efforts, initially conducted through constitutional channels, culminated in the establishment of an oligarchy, the Council ofin the Athenian coup of BCE. The identification of this "flaw" is a key to his criticism of Athenian popular rule.

Yet in the case of Pericles, it is wrong to see Athenian democracy thesis power as coming from his long series of annual generalships each year along with nine others.

Yet, after the demise of Athenian democracy, few looked upon it as a good form of government. For much of the 5th century at least democracy fed off an empire of subject states.

All of them were subject to a review beforehand that might disqualify them for office and an examination after stepping down. At times the imperialist democracy acted with extreme brutality, as in the decision to execute the entire male population of Melos and sell off its women and children simply for refusing to become subjects of Athens.

Of these three bodies, the assembly and the courts were the true sites of power — although courts, unlike the assembly, were never simply called the demos the People as they were manned by a subset of the citizen body, those over thirty.

Unlike in the U. In the 5th century BC we often hear of the assembly sitting as a court of judgment itself for trials of political importance and it is not a coincidence that is the number both for the full quorum for the assembly and for the annual pool from which jurors were picked for particular trials.

No judges presided over the courts nor did anyone give legal direction to the jurors; magistrates had only an administrative function and were laymen. Furthermore, all citizens selected were reviewed before taking up office dokimasia at which they might be disqualified.Athens in the 5th to 4th century BCE had an extraordinary system of government: democracy.

Under this system, all male citizens had equal political rights, freedom of speech, and the opportunity to participate directly in the political arena. The thesis statement for Athens and Democracy you see here is just a SAMPLE of what we can provide you in research.

Papers are always original and we guarantee each research paper, Sophocles research papers discuss Athenian Democracy through the plays of Oedipus and Antigone.

Athenian democracy

Athenian democracy developed around the fifth century BC in the Greek city-state (known as a polis) of Athens, comprising the city of Athens and the surrounding territory of Attica, and is often described as the first known democracy in the world.

Other Greek cities set up democracies, most following the Athenian model, but none are as well. It is a common enough held belief that Athenian democracy was only made possible by slave labour.

In fact, it is an obvious argument against the claim that Athens was democratic. Field contends that this ‘[ ]is entirely untrue. Since Athenian law is the subject of this discussion series, the present introduction to Athenian democracy will not describe the lawcourts in as much detail as it has given to the Assembly and Council.

The Use of Rhetoric In Athenian Democracy - Rhetoric was a major factor in the development and maintenance of the Athenian government and was used by many in order to gain power and ascend in politics.

Athenian democracy thesis
Rated 5/5 based on 22 review